The Pursuit of Harley Davidson: Shtick or Smart?

Not going to write a long post - but wanted to share what Steve Winsor at Victors & Spoils is up to. Rather than just hoping his group will end up on Harley Davidson’s highly sought after RFP list…he and his team have instead decided to go ahead and start working on the brand. No talking. Just doing.

He’s opened it up to his agency team…

They’ve also created a platform that enables crowdsourcing….

They will only charge for ideas that Harley Davidson buys…

And they’ve essentially invited/challenged Harley to give them a chance.

Whether or not Harley Davidson engages- time will tell. Regardless, V&S has changed the way the review process works. And even if they don’t end up laughing all the way to the bank…they are certainly already laughing all the way to the top of the press.

So, maybe a little schtick…but also smart. So so smart.

Read the full post here: http://bit.ly/9nnW2S

Posted by

Comments [0]

Ditchdigging or Brain Surgery? Yes.

I had a boss once that told me that advertising is more ditch digging than brain surgery, meaning that it’s more about the hard work than the brain work. To a not-that-thoughtful 20-something it sounded good, especially when I got to say it (egads), so I went with it. 

More than a few years into this crazy world that I love, I realize that I completely and unreservedly disagree.  Bollocks!, I say to the idea that what we provide is more about the sweat we put into it than the smarts. 

And bollocks on behalf of all of the people who put work together like Arcade Fire and The Wilderness Downtown to the Old Spice Guy to (insert your favorite VW ad here), to the campaigns we just presented to our client Southwest Airlines and the upcoming augmented reality project for the U.S. Air Force.  These are all examples of thoughtful, interesting work that took a lot of hard work to get done and done right.  I think that is one of the reasons I like the work I do here—as a collective at Idea City we do whatever it takes to build our clients business, which means that I work with a bunch of people pushing and thinking and sweating all day everyday to get it right.  And at the end of the day, or the end of the project, there is great satisfaction in that—the sore muscles, fully contented, sitting, having a beer and surveying your work on a hot day satisfaction we can all appreciate. 

So in celebration of good thinking and hard work, I share this sculpture by Korean artist Gwon Osang. They are made from hundreds of photographs of the original subjects, overlayed onto life-sized mannequins to create an effect which is both realistic and surreal at the same time. If you want to see more of this amazing work, go to www.lostateminor.com and look under the design tab. 

Posted by

Comments [0]

Never Shop At A Book Store When You¹re Stupid. #gsdm

You’ve probably heard that saying: “Never go grocery shopping when you’re hungry.” Well, it makes sense. You end up buyin’ all kinds of junk food that looks yummy, or buyin’ way more than you planned on.

  Which reminds me of that time I went to a liquor store sober.

  Dude. Big mistake. (“Awww, man, gotta get me some of this vodka. And this gin. Get some gin. Ooooo, tequila, get that.”)

  Well, wouldn’t you know it, just the other day I walked into Book People here in Austin…. and I walked in stupid. Because there is so much that I don’t know, well, suddenly I’m reachin’ for every stinkin’ book on the shelves.

(“Gotta get me the new Franzen book. Oh, man, and lookit this new Blackwell title, ‘Outliers.’ He’s so smart, gotta git that.”)

Man oh man, I nearly flattened the embossed numbers on my Mastercard.

  You know what might cure me of this book problem?

  The new Kindle. Reason I say that is because the ads say the new Kindle can store 3,500 titles. Three thousand five hundred titles?

  Here’s the thing. I’m a pretty fast reader. On vacation, I’ve been known to put away a book a day. But even at my best, … 3,500 titles? Polishing off that digital bookshelf would take nine and a half years of constant speed reading. Even Evelyn Wood, the speed-reading queen herself, man, at around book #1,954 … wouldn’t she just blow up?

  Do I really need to carry 3,500 books on vacation? A guy named Barry Schwarz wrote a cool book called The Paradox of Choice. His main thesis: “We assume that more choice means greater satisfaction when it fact it means less.” He posits that a massive number of things to choose from can make a person feel bewildered, then anxious, and ultimately less satisfied after taking a purchase decision.

  I think I know what Mr. Schwarz’s talkin’ about. Can you imagine if the first iPod’s commercials promised “A Trillion Songs In Your Pocket.” Man, I’d just tip over at the concept of a mathematical eternity burnin’ a hole in my pocket. I’d blow up.

Don’t get me wrong, I happen to love my e-reader (an iPad). But I don’t think the main promise of a Kindle or an iPad is a Brobdingnagian memory. Just gimme a digital L.L.Bean tote’s-worth. Just enough books to get me through the Labor Day weekend.

###

   

 

Posted by

Comments [0]

The Other Side of Social

Posted by

Comments [1]

You can't schedule an idea.

I've attended a few "brainstorming sessions" recently, and I thought to myself, "These things never work." These meetings don't really due justice to where ideas actually come from. Think about where you've ever been when you've had a great idea. For me, it's one of a few places: When I'm running; when I'm driving; in the shower; just before I go to sleep; or sitting with my copywriter. These situations are all similar in that, for the most part, I am in complete quiet solitude. Alone with my brain, often not thinking about the specific problem at all.

  Ideas don't just strike special people at magical moments. It's what happens before that moment that's important. In "Hey Whipple, Squeeze This." Luke Sullivan points us to a simple system developed by James Webb Young (...and reworded by me):

1. Learn Hard
2. Think Hard
3. Wait...
4. "OH, SHIT!"
5. Make it happen

Those first two steps are real work. The brief, research, asking questions, and generally filling your brain with as much information as you can. Then, figuring out what that information means, mixing it together with other stuff you're thinking about, movies, art, conversations, whatever. But don't let Step #3 slip by. That waiting is critical. You have to give your brain time to stew, to synthesize the information, and formulate something good. I’m talking DAYS. It's scary to think you don't have any control over it, but when it's your job to create ideas, you get comfortable with the fact that you just gotta wait and it'll come.

"Brainstorms" don't allow for Step #3 at all. And they usually skip over the first two as well. Watching one person try in vain just to be heard illustrates the fact that this situation only rewards fast thinkers and loud talkers. There's not time or space in the room for contemplation, inspiration or academic consideration. And in the end, all we ever end up with is a few over sized sheets of paper with indecipherable multi-colored scribbles on them.

I'm not saying that only "creatives" should be allowed to go away and come up with ideas. Good ideas can come from anywhere and anyone. There's nothing I love more than when the junior account guy speaks up with a genius solution. Or when a producer knows just what to say to fix a problem in an edit bay. It's great when people bring a few nice thoughts to the table, and we can work together to make them stronger.

A "brainstorm" can be useful for certain things. A specific, well defined task: "We need 50 interesting animals," or "What are some movies with great driving scenes?" This sort of thing can be knocked out efficiently with a few people in a room. When the assignment is more nebulous, we run into problems. And don't even get me started on the "break-out session."

A group of smart people in a room can be a really powerful thing, if used in the right way. Let's bring people together to talk about the problem, to teach each other about the challenge and show each other interesting things. We can get all of our brains on the same page in respect to the task at hand. But let's not force ourselves to try to demonstrate how quick and loud we are. We need a little space to think. Then we can come back together, share our best ideas and work to make the best ones better.

I'd love to start a conversation on this. Please comment, tell me why I'm wrong, or right. And if you think brainstorms can be effective, or should be abolished.  

And just a note: AdWeek posted a great article <http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/special-issues/lifestyle-special/e3i9b820010dbb05bb5faf5cb5ddf77b472?imw=Y>  on creative inspiration today.

Posted by

Comments [1]

Stealing Genius: Make It Matter

I hear it a lot in meetings, someone inevitably says, “…there are no new ideas”.  This in itself is not a new idea, as T.S. Eliot said, “Talent Imitates, Genius Steals”.  Personally, I prefer Jean Luc Godard via Jim Jarmusch, “It’s not where you take things from, it’s where you take things to.”

I agree with Jean Luc and Jim, which is why I’ve been curious about the plethora of Founding Fathers sightings in advertising recently.  I started noticing it back in May when Citizens Bank used the Founding Fathers to make the following argument with consumers:  Our country was founded on ‘citizenship’---- banking is a direct descendent of that ideal----thus we, Citizens Bank, are a direct descendent of the ideals of our country---hence you should bank with us.’

 

 

This campaign ostensibly stemmed directly from some research Citizens Bank fielded.  In a BrandWeek  article of May, 2010, Theresa McLaughlin, group EVP and CMO of Citizens Financial Group, said the new campaign stemmed from research that showed 78 percent of consumers want to do business with companies that have “shared values.” "[That number] was a key stat for us as we put this campaign together,” she said.  She went on to say that while "we’re exposing our values and our credo to prospects and consumers," she added. 

So, if I understand what she is saying, their values are best expressed our through the values of our Founding Fathers, specifically Alexander Hamilton’s exhortation that “good banking equals good citizenship”.

Then I noticed President Washington driving, literally, through a line of fearfully awed Redcoats.  As this happens, Dodge Challenger tells us that Americans have always done two things well:  cars and freedom—in that order.  Oh yes: cars, freedom and apparently, vehicular manslaughter.  Personally I think we are a bit more than that, but war—and branding—is hell, so the bigger ‘gun’ wins and really, to an American, according to Dodge, nothing comes before a muscle car with a Hemi V8. 

Jefferson then threw a pissy little fit because some suburban mom stole his ‘Homestyle Mac-n-Cheese’ recipe.  Not his finest moment and I’ve read David McCullough’s biography of John Adams where Jefferson has few, if any, good moments.

 

Bud Light, it seems, took us backwards to the original Fourth of July, which consisted of the Founding Fathers getting jiggy with some old school, powdered hoochie mamas—and one clumsy guy accidentally setting off a canon creating the first fireworks.  Ahh, boobs, bombs and beer…. We are American because we party like it’s 1776!  Rock on, dudes!

 

 

And finally, I guess because there are no more live white men to make fun of in ads, Geico took on poor Abraham Lincoln and his wife Mary in a convoluted story about telling the truth, or maybe it’s the perils of telling the truth, I’m not sure anymore.  Geico, as usual, gets the humor right at least (and really, the jokes on us women because as per usual whenever that question is asked:  Yes, Mary your ass looked huge in that dress).

I can see where these brands are coming from:  we’ve all seen research that tells us that during difficult times we look to find comfort in brands that we can trust.  But is that enough?  First, is borrowing the genius of the Founding Fathers enough to get us to trust these brands? 

Maybe not: It turns out that the American public aren’t so gullible:  we believe politicians, even some of our more iconic founding fathers, lie to us. Shock!  Horror!

And stealing the genius of “Americana” isn’t as easy as shoving  a be-wigged statesman into your commercial.  In fact, most polls and people will tell you that ‘being American’ is being/living a set of ideals and values:  from the driven curiosity of “Go west, young man” to the iconic meaning of the cowboy and the white picket fence to the power inherent in the freedom of diversity, speech and more.

 

Second, did they take us to somewhere better for having the Founding Fathers as the centerpiece of their messages?  Who knows—I guess that is a subjective call.  But I can tell you that taking a cynical, savvy consumer base to a better place is difficult—but not impossible—to do and doesn’t require the power of a historic statesman to do it. Take the simplicity of a walk.  A walk can be a long history like the one for Johnnie Walker in “The Man Who Walked Around the World”, or it can be many quietly intimate excursions like for LL Bean in their new ad, “Journey”.  Each walk came from a different place—deep within their soul—and more importantly, each took us to a different place. 

We’ve all imitated talent and stolen genius, but if the proof is in what you do with that genius, then as a consumer and ad person I’m asking, nay begging, take it (and me) somewhere that matters!.  Make your brand matter to me, help me to understand why I should trust my dollar with you. And whether that journey is through awe or surprise, whether it grosses me out and/or teaches me something, whether you utilize a dead president, an employee or a ‘regular joe’, don’t’ let the genius you stole be nothing more than just a simple prop.

 

Posted by

Comments [0]

Mashup Madness. Great song+cheesy animation+overwrought singing=Internet gold. #gsdm #video #shatner #startrek


Oh my. The things people will spend their time doing. Bless them for creating gems like this. I’ve loved this William Shatner rendition of “Common People” by alt rock UK band Pulp for years. I can’t help thinking that whoever put this together had an immense amount of patience and a scary amount of animated Star Trek footage.

PS  Here's the Pulp version. I prefer Shatner. You?

Big Old Media for Hire / New Life from Apparent Death

I’ve had more than one person re-tweet or comment on posts of mine saying how “big” or “old” media don’t “get it”.  To be clear, that is not my intent.  My goal is to not be seen as from some sort of “new” school of media anymore than it is to be viewed as from an “old” one.

 

Though I am fascinated with, not to mention pretty much vested in, the media business and have plenty of thoughts and opinions on the matter that I’ve shared and will continue to share freely, I am more fascinated with why people do the things they do with the hardware and software that makes up their experiences with media – which ultimately drives the media business.

 

Perhaps this fascination with why people do the things they do with media is the “it” the “big”, “old” media companies don’t “get” in their pursuit of profits.   Fully respecting they are indeed in business to turn a profit, said profit cannot be turned without understanding that the dynamics of why and how people use media has changed.

 

In his book Cognitive Surplus, Clay Shirky puts it thusly:

 

“But what if all this time, providing professional content isn’t the only job we’ve been hiring media to do?  What if we’ve also been hiring it to make us feel connected, engaged, or just less lonely?  What if we’ve always wanted to produce as well as consume, but no one offered us that opportunity?”

 

I felt this confluence of what people hire media to do vs. what media companies’ need to do to turn a profit come to life as I read the cover story from Wired, The Web is Dead, a well done chicken-and-egg, point-counterpoint on the shift from web usage to Internet-driven app usage (Yes, Virginia, they're really is a difference between the web and the Internet). 

 

My abridged version:

·         The benefit of the shift to Internet-driven apps for people is they can easily get what they want, when they want it, and it works better and faster than a web-based experience.  People save time two ways – by not having to look as hard for what they want and apps tend to perform better/faster than the web.

·         The benefit to media companies is these are semi-walled or entirely walled experiences they can fully control for which they can charge – either directly for the app or using the app as a gateway to charging for something that the app links to. 

·         And due to the aforementioned benefits of time savings and better experience, people are OK paying for it.

 

One thing “big”, “old” media does “get” is producing content or experiences that are contained and they have full control over (see TV programs, magazines, newspapers, etc).  And now they can allow people to build upon and share this content and/or experience via the Internet thru connections to other apps for social networks - or maybe even on the web (though it is apparently on its last legs - hold that thought).  Thus, the value - both in terms of the value people perceive from being able to do what they want with the content as well as the potentially claimed media value from more impressions - increases for everyone involved in this foodchain.

 

Ultimately, people feel they get an honest day’s work from the media they hired, proving yet again that people are willing to part with money if it means they save time, especially if they are able to save time in two ways. 

 

Ta da.  “Big”, “old” media gets “it”.

 

But I do believe the “death” of the web is greatly over exaggerated – obviously in order to sell magazines (oh, those “big”, “old” media and their marketing tactics).  In spite of the bleakness of the cover, Chris Anderson – editor in chief of Wired and the man who literally wrote the book on Free - does come around as he closes:

 

“…the great virtue of today’s Web is that so much of it is noncommercial.  The wide-open Web of peer production, the so-called generative Web where everyone is free to create what they want, continues to thrive, driven by the nonmonetary incentives of expression, attention, reputation and the like.” 

 

This makes me think of the web as a big, old R&D sandbox for figuring out the next great app – dare I say “killer” app that could deliver a monetary incentive.  And maybe now we can stop having to hear “big”, “old” media lament the “pennies” they make on the web compared to the “dollars” of profit from their “old” media outlets.

 

I think what this begs for from those of us in the business is to move from a commitment to be, as a colleague of mine recently pointed out, “media neutral” to “media positive”, or, as I countered to my colleague, from “media agnostic” to “media religious”.  As “big”, “old” media finds opportunity for profit in “new” places, we have to commit ourselves to finding relevant opportunity for people to hire the media we plan, buy and/or create, be it “old” or “new”, “digital” or “analog”. 

Posted by

Comments [1]

"All Art Is Theft." #gsdm




“All art is theft.” That’s a Picasso quotation, I believe. (That or he stole it from somewhere.)



I sometimes read how one agency accuses another for stealing an idea. And while this probably happens from time to time, more often than not the similarity between the two pieces of creative is incidental; some minor format or architectural detail.

“Hey, wait a goll-darn minute! We already did an ad with a guy in it!”

I’m wondering if we need to be nicer to each other about this kinda stuff. Agreed, real concept thieves ought to be pilloried in the town square. But when the similarities between two pieces of creative are incidental to the main idea, I think it’s time for a CTFD pill. (Private joke with my friend John: “Calm The F*** Down.”)

As an example, let’s talk about similar formats in radio commercials. Today I’ve posted four radio spots on my own blog that all use phones. (“Hey, we had a phone in our spot, dammit!”)

The thing is, there’s nothing wrong with using a common format, like a phone call or a man-on-the-street gig ….  if –  key word –  if you do something new and wonderful with it.

For starters, check out this great spot for truth®. (All four spots can be heard by clicking “Four Cool Radio Spots” here.) Yes, it’s another phone call concept but what makes this one cool is that it’s an actual phone call to an actual cigarette company.

The thing is, it’s not like the set-up of two people on a phone is allowed just one use. As my friend Andy Ellis says, “Dude, it’s not a piñata.” The sad part is spots as good as this are often shot down in award shows because one of the judges just has to be the first cool guy to mumble, “Heard it.” (Two rings of the phone and he’s “heard it.”)

Okay, check out this other great phone-call spot for Volkswagen. Starts with the same ring but where it goes is what makes it so delightful. I can just picture this knucklehead driving his Jetta somewhere in the clouds. (If I may critique, I wish the actress had sounded a little more like a real person. She sounds too polished.)

Okay, in fairness, here’s a chance to criticize my work. I did these next two spots, both of which  feature phone-answering services. One’s for Miller Lite beer and the other for a teeny client we had at Fallon, Dunwoody Technical Institute in Minneapolis.

You may think they both suck. (One of ‘em actually won $20k in the Mercury’s.) And even if you do think they suck, I’ll bet you’ll agree that they’re significantly different pieces of creative that, even played back to back, send the listener to different places.

I hope I’ve made my point here. You are, of course, free to disagree. Overall, though, I say we oughta go easier on each other about this “stolen creative” stuff. Save it for when someone actually steals your idea, not your sound effects.

 

------ End of Forwarded Message

Posted by

Comments [1]